This New Music Network event offered updates to the improvised music genre from two contrasting groups.
This New Music Network event offered updates to the improvised music genre from two contrasting groups. It was perfect ‘new music’ material.
Computer musicians operated their laptops not just as sampling devices but as equals beside more traditional instruments. They manipulated timbral, textural and melodic material in turn.
The two-piece Cycle~440 opened this night with expressive undulations from piano and laptop entwined. The piano’s output included effective quasi-minimalist motivic repetitions.
Heavily-pedalled sensitivity piano was punctuated by severe contrasts of broad sonic strokes from the computer. Some exquisite melodic invention from the acoustic keyboard could have been further developed in more extended melodic laptop sampling and stronger interplay from the duo.
However, Cycle~440’s overall ambient gift of semi-improvised sound was unique, interesting and well received. Some exciting climaxes ensued.
The next ensemble, Tangents, impressed with two satisfying extended sections in its totally improvised set. A large buffet of traditional and newer forces was sampled.
Prepared piano, innovative drum kit playing, cello fragments and effects, lead guitar and three laptops combined with fine balance, innately honed listening as well as increasing momentum and direction.
Tangent’s climax to the second section of the set was driving and homogenous despite the various elements and instruments mixed.
A highlight of this night was that musical expression and collaboration was a priority in the performances. Effects for shocking effect’s sake remained a concept of the past. A morphed, modern, high-tech jazz gig delighted instead.
New Music Network present
Tangents and Cycle~440
Tangents: Ollie Bown – computer; Peter Hollo – cello, electronics; Shoeb Ahmad – guitar, computer; Adrian Lim-Klumpes – piano, flute, electronics; Evan Dorrian – drums
Cycle~440: Sam Gillies and Kevin Penkin
Sound Lounge, Seymour Centre, Sydney
First published on
What the stars mean?
- Five stars: Exceptional, unforgettable, a must see
- Four and a half stars: Excellent, definitely worth seeing
- Four stars: Accomplished and engrossing but not the best of its kind
- Three and a half stars: Good, clever, well made, but not brilliant
- Three stars: Solid, enjoyable, but unremarkable or flawed
- Two and half stars: Neither good nor bad, just adequate
- Two stars: Not without its moments, but ultimately unsuccessful
- One star: Awful, to be avoided
- Zero stars: Genuinely dreadful, bad on every level